Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result
I G McDonald1, J Daly, V M Jelinek
1St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objectives:
To determine the rate of failure of patient reassurance after a normal test result and study the determinants of failure.
Design:
Replicated single case study with qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
Setting:
University teaching hospital.
Subjects:
40 consecutive patients referred for echocardiography either because of symptoms (10 patients) or because of a heart murmur (30). 39 were shown to have a normal heart.
Interventions:
Medical consultations and semistructured patient interviews were tape recorded. Structured interviews with consultant cardiologists were recorded in survey form.
Main Outcome Measures:
Patient recall of the explanation and residual understanding, doubt, and anxiety about the heart after the test and post-test consultation.
Results:
All 10 patients presenting with symptoms were left with anxiety about the heart despite a normal test result and reassurance by the consultant. Of 28 patients referred because of a murmur but shown to have no heart abnormality, 20 became anxious after detection of the murmur; 11 had residual anxiety despite the normal test result.
Conclusions:
Reassurance of the "worried well"-anxious patients with symptoms or patients concerned by a health query resulting from a routine medical examination or from screening-constitutes a large part of medical practice. It seems to be widely assumed that explaining that tests have shown no abnormality is enough to reassure. The results of this study refute this and emphasise the importance of personal and social factors as obstacles to reassurance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Placebo Effect
Hindsight Biases
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
The Anderson-Darling Test
Significance Testing: Overview
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

