Related Experiment Videos
Assessment of left ventricular function after radiofrequency and direct current atrioventricular node ablation
Summary
Radiofrequency (RF) or low-energy direct current (DC) ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) junction does not impact left ventricular (LV) function. High-energy DC ablation, however, can impair LV function due to the shock
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Limited data exists on the impact of atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation on left ventricular (LV) function.
- Both LV function deterioration and improvement have been reported after direct current (DC) ablation.
- Potential causes for LV dysfunction include barotrauma, arcing, coagulation, and chronic ventricular pacing effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate LV function changes following different AV junction ablation methods.
- To compare outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation and low-energy DC ablation with high-energy DC ablation.
- To assess LV function in patients with chronic ventricular pacing without AV junction ablation.
Main Methods:
- Assessed LV function using radionuclide angiography in patients undergoing RF ablation, low-energy DC ablation, and controls with ventricular pacing.
- Compared results with previously reported data from high-energy DC ablation.
- Monitored global LV function and segmental wall motion before, immediately after, and three months post-ablation at a pacing rate of 110 bpm.
Main Results:
- High-energy DC ablation led to a significant fall in global LV function (50% to 43%, p=0.02) and segmental wall motion impairment.
- Low-energy DC ablation caused segmental wall motion impairment but did not significantly affect global ejection fraction (47% to 45.5%, p>0.05).
- Neither RF ablation (44% to 45.3%, p>0.05) nor chronic ventricular pacing (46.7% to 47%, p>0.05) altered global or segmental LV function.
Conclusions:
- Low-energy DC or RF ablation of the AV junction does not adversely affect global LV ejection fraction.
- Deterioration in global LV function following high-energy DC shock ablation is likely due to the shock's effects, not chronic ventricular pacing.
- These findings suggest RF and low-energy DC ablation are safer alternatives for preserving LV function.