Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Uncalibrated distortions vs undersampling

D J Field1, R F Hess

  • 1Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. djf3@cornell.edu

Vision Research
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a Comprehensive Anatomical Matrix for Crown Birds: Phylogenetic Insights from the Pectoral Girdle and Forelimb Skeleton.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Interocular interaction of contrast and luminance signals in human primary visual cortex.

NeuroImage·2017
Same author

Our study 20 years on: UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Intensive care medicine·2016
Same author

Glutamate Receptor Interacting Protein 1 Regulates CD4(+) CTLA-4 Expression and Transplant Rejection.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same author

Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: a prospective population-based study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2015
Same author

Experiences with maternal and perinatal death reviews in the UK--the MBRRACE-UK programme.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2014
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Positional errors in vision are primarily caused by uncalibrated neural distortions, not undersampling, except in the far periphery near the acuity limit. This clarifies visual system function in normal and amblyopic vision.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Previous research suggested a link between positional and contrast errors in undersampled visual systems.
  • The authors' prior work (Hess & Field, 1993) proposed a predictable relationship between these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-state and defend the main points of a previous publication.
  • To address the response by Levi and Klein regarding visual positional errors.
  • To clarify the primary causes of positional errors in normal peripheral and amblyopic visual systems.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of existing data and theoretical arguments.
  • Comparison of positional error explanations in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
  • Evaluation of the role of undersampling versus neural distortions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Positional errors in the normal periphery and amblyopic visual system are mainly attributed to uncalibrated distortions in local neuronal signs.
  • Undersampling significantly contributes to positional errors only in the extreme periphery, near the visual acuity limit.
  • Evidence suggests undersampling is insufficient to explain positional errors in the normal periphery or the central field of amblyopes.

Conclusions:

  • Uncalibrated distortions in local neuronal signs are the principal cause of visual positional errors.
  • Undersampling is a secondary factor, relevant only at the limits of visual acuity in the far periphery.
  • The findings support a neuro-centric explanation for visual positional errors over a purely sampling-based one.