Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Location vs feature: reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions

Y Tanaka1, S Shimojo

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Brain Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. yasuto@nisan.weizmann.ac.il

Vision Research
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex.

Translational psychiatry·2013
Same author

Dynamic effects and information quantifiers of statistical memory of MEG's signals at photosensitive epilepsy.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2009
Same author

Wavelet-crosscorrelation analysis: Non-stationary analysis of neurophysiological signals.

Brain topography·2005
Same author

Effect of sodium valproate on neuromagnetic responses to chromatic flicker: implication for photosensitivity.

Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN·2005
Same author

A grid computing infrastructure for MEG data analysis.

Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN·2005
Same author

The first grid for the oral and maxillofacial region and its application for speech analysis.

Methods of information in medicine·2005

Reaction time shows opposite effects based on task type. Location tasks cause slower responses (inhibition of return), while feature discrimination tasks speed them up (facilitation of return).

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Previous research indicates that reaction times can be affected by the repetition of stimulus locations.
  • Two distinct patterns, inhibition of return (IOR) and facilitation of return (FOR), have been observed, but their underlying mechanisms and task dependencies require further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dichotomy of inhibition of return (IOR) and facilitation of return (FOR) in visual attention.
  • To determine how different types of visual discrimination tasks influence reaction times based on previous trial locations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed detection or discrimination tasks involving target location, color, orientation, vernier, size, and luminance.
  • Reaction times were measured under conditions of repeated and varied stimulus locations across trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tasks involving eye-movement and arm-reaching were also included for comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • Location discrimination and detection tasks showed longer reaction times with repeated locations (IOR).
    • Color, orientation, vernier, size, and luminance discrimination tasks exhibited shorter reaction times with repeated locations (FOR).
    • The same stimuli elicited IOR in global location tasks and FOR in feature analysis tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • The observed dichotomy suggests distinct processing pathways for spatial vs. feature-based information.
    • These findings may map onto neurophysiological distinctions, such as "where" (spatial) versus "what" (feature) processing pathways.
    • Task demands critically determine whether spatial repetition leads to inhibition or facilitation of return.