Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Judgements of heading

A V van den Berg1

  • 1Helmholtz School for Autonomous Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vandenberg@fysl.fgg.eur.nl

Vision Research
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional MRI of visual cortex predicts training-induced recovery in stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021
Same author

Impaired visual competition in patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Visual perception of axes of head rotation.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2013
Same author

Transfer effects of training-induced visual field recovery in patients with chronic stroke.

Topics in stroke rehabilitation·2012
Same author

Oculomotor behavior of hemianopic chronic stroke patients in a driving simulator is modulated by vision training.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
Same author

Effects of vision restoration training on early visual cortex in patients with cerebral blindness investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Journal of neurophysiology·2010
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Vision and ego-motion perception are complex. Conflicting visual and extra-retinal cues lead to curved path illusions, while aligned cues enable accurate rectilinear motion perception.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Perception

Background:

  • Ego-motion perception relies on integrating visual (retinal flow) and extra-retinal (eye, head, body movement) information.
  • Discrepancies between these cues can create perceptual conflicts, influencing perceived self-motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the brain resolves conflicts between visual and extra-retinal information in ego-motion perception.
  • To determine the influence of visual representations on perceived heading under conflicting sensory conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Presenting retinal flow patterns simulating ego-motion to stationary and rotating eyes.
  • Comparing perceived ego-motion paths (curved vs. rectilinear) under conditions of sensory conflict and congruence.
  • Analyzing illusory motion in depth and its effect on heading judgments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • When visual and extra-retinal information conflict, observers often perceive ego-motion on a curved path.
  • When information is congruent, simulated rectilinear ego-motion is perceived accurately.
  • Illusory motion in depth occurs with simulated eye rotation, but heading judgments based on this are more accurate than those from the overall motion pattern.

Conclusions:

  • The brain can adopt different representations of ego-motion based on sensory input, prioritizing either visual flow or extra-retinal information.
  • Perceptual choices between these representations influence the accuracy and nature of perceived heading.
  • Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for explaining human spatial navigation and motion perception.