Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2026
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
The high stakes of risk communication
1Rowan & Blewitt, Incorporated, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Background:
Risk communication involves coping with lack of public knowledge of science, scientific complexity and uncertainty, disagreement among experts on risk characterization and comparison, assumptions in risk assessment, the role of advocates, distortion in the mass media, manipulative public relations, and public outrage.
Methods:
This article summarizes two case studies, one of an emerging issue, the use of oxygenates in gasoline, and the other of efforts to deter smoking in public places.
Results:
Risk communication is most successful when individuals are empowered than when they are manipulated or coerced.
Conclusion:
Scientists should understand public concerns and values, express a commitment to dialogue and power sharing, and develop accurate risk assessment information.
Related Concept Videos
03:26Framing Effects
01:27Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
01:25Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
01:21Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:12Relative Risk