Related Experiment Videos

Distinction of mutagenic carcinogens from a mutagenic noncarcinogen in the big blue transgenic mouse

M L Cunningham1, J J Hayward, B S Shane

  • 1Environmental Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. cunning1@niehs.nih.gov

Insights

The Big Blue transgenic mouse assay detected higher mutagenicity for 2,4-diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT), a liver carcinogen, compared to non-carcinogen 2,6-diaminotoluene (2,6-DAT) after 90 days of exposure. This demonstrates the assay

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Genetics
  • Carcinogenesis

Background:

  • 2,4-diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT) is a potent hepatocarcinogen, while its isomer 2,6-diaminotoluene (2,6-DAT) is not carcinogenic in rodents.
  • Both 2,4-DAT and 2,6-DAT are equally mutagenic in the Ames test, highlighting a discrepancy between in vitro mutagenicity and in vivo carcinogenicity.
  • The Big Blue transgenic B6C3F1 mouse model possesses multiple copies of the lacl gene, serving as a target for detecting mutations in vivo.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the Big Blue transgenic mouse system in differentiating in vivo mutagenic activity between the hepatocarcinogen 2,4-DAT and the non-carcinogen 2,6-DAT.
  • To ascertain whether the in vivo mutagenesis assay results correlate with established rodent carcinogen bioassay findings for these compounds.

Main Methods:

  • Male B6C3F1 Big Blue transgenic mice were administered diets containing 0 or 1,000 ppm of 2,4-DAT or 2,6-DAT for 30 and 90 days.
  • Dimethylnitrosamine was used as a positive control in the study.
  • Mutant frequencies in the lacl gene were quantified to assess in vivo mutagenicity.

Main Results:

  • At 30 days of exposure, mutant frequencies were comparable across all groups, including controls.
  • After 90 days, the mutant frequency in mice exposed to 2,4-DAT (12.1 ± 1.4 x 10^-5) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than in age-matched controls (5.7 ± 2.9 x 10^-5) and mice exposed to 2,6-DAT (5.7 ± 2.4 x 10^-5).
  • The Big Blue assay revealed a differential mutagenic response dependent on the duration of exposure.

Conclusions:

  • The Big Blue transgenic mutation assay successfully distinguished the in vivo mutagenic differences between the hepatocarcinogen 2,4-DAT and the non-carcinogen 2,6-DAT.
  • The assay demonstrated sensitivity to mutagens following subchronic dietary exposure.
  • The findings indicate that the Big Blue system can yield differential responses based on exposure duration, aligning with carcinogenicity data.

Related Concept Videos