Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The five Rs: refinement, reduction, replacement. A regulatory revolution

R N Lucken1

  • 1Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Addlestone, Surrey, England.

Developments in Biological Standardization
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alternatives to in vivo potency and protection tests for veterinary vaccines.

Developments in biological standardization·1999
Same author

Reducing the use of the target animal batch safety test for veterinary vaccines.

Developments in biological standardization·1996
Same author

Chick embryo assay for staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1.

Methods in enzymology·1988
Same author

Effect of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 on chicken embryos.

Infection and immunity·1985
Same author

Toxicity of interferon.

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1981
Same author

The effects of laboratory animal diets on the potency tests of bacterial vaccines.

Developments in biological standardization·1980
Same journal

International challenges and public policy issues.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Regulation of biologicals in China.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

ICH activities on biotech topics.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Regulation of biologicals in the European Union.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Standardisation and licensing of combination vaccines based on DTP.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Control of foot-and-mouth disease by vaccination.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
See all related articles

Regulatory authorities can accelerate the reduction of animal testing in batch control by embracing novel techniques and reviewing the necessity of animal use. This promotes ethical quality assurance and reduces reliance on traditional animal-based tests.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Regulatory requirements are often cited as a barrier to reducing animal testing in batch control.
  • Regulatory authorities and pharmacopoeial committees have been slow to adopt emerging knowledge and novel techniques.
  • Current quality control testing relies heavily on animal-based methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the regulatory approach to quality control tests within quality assurance and total quality management.
  • To explore the role of regulatory authorities in promoting the reduction of animal-based tests.
  • To encourage manufacturers to explore alternative testing approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of regulatory approaches to quality assurance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the role of regulatory authorities in promoting reduced animal testing.
  • Consideration of specific animal tests amenable to deletion or modification.

    • Main Results:

    • Regulatory authorities can play a key role in encouraging manufacturers to explore alternative methods.
    • A formal review of the benefits of animal testing for each batch is proposed.
    • Specific proposals for immediate reduction in animal usage are identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Regulatory authorities should exercise caution when requesting additional data that requires animal testing.
    • Encouraging manufacturers to explore alternative approaches can significantly reduce animal use.
    • A shift towards modern techniques and a critical review of existing practices is needed to minimize animal testing in quality control.