Related Experiment Videos
Nonhuman primates will not respond to turn off strong 60 Hz electric fields
W R Rogers1, J L Orr, H D Smith
1Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78228-0510, USA.
Bioelectromagnetics
|January 1, 1995
Summary
Electric fields (EF) up to 65 kV/m were tested on baboons. Results indicate that strong electric fields are not aversive to nonhuman primates, even at high intensities.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Primate behavior
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Understanding the biological effects of electric fields (EF) is crucial for safety assessments.
- Previous research on animal responses to EF has yielded mixed results.
- Nonhuman primates offer a valuable model for studying sensory perception and behavioral responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potentially aversive nature of a 60 Hz electric field (EF) in baboons (Papio cynocephalus).
- To determine if EF exposure at high intensities affects operant responding and serves as a reinforcer or discriminative stimulus.
- To establish the EF detection threshold in baboons.
Main Methods:
- Six baboons were trained using food rewards for cue-light-initiated responses.
- Experiments involved presenting a 60 Hz EF during operant tasks, varying stimulus and reward conditions.
- EF detection thresholds were determined through behavioral responses.
Main Results:
- Baboons did not alter operant responding for food rewards in the presence of a strong EF (up to 65 kV/m).
- Termination of a strong EF alone was not a sufficient reinforcer for normal response rates.
- EF served as a discriminative stimulus and could function as a secondary reinforcer.
- EF exposure above the detection threshold (12 kV/m) was not found to be aversive.
Conclusions:
- A 60 Hz electric field, even at intensities significantly above the detection threshold, is not aversive to nonhuman primates.
- Baboons can detect electric fields but do not exhibit avoidance behavior at high intensities.
- Findings suggest that high-intensity EF exposure is unlikely to pose an aversive risk to nonhuman primates.