Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone remodeling around implanted ceramics

Y S Chang1, M Oka, T Nakamura

  • 1Department of Artificial Locomotive Systems, Kyoto University, Japan.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of various structure treatments on histological fixation of titanium implants.

The Journal of arthroplasty·1998
Same author

Synthetic osteochondral replacement of the femoral articular surface.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·1997
Same author

Histologic comparison of tibial articular surfaces against rigid materials and artificial articular cartilage.

Journal of biomedical materials research·1997
Same author

Significance of interstitial bone ingrowth under load-bearing conditions: a comparison between solid and porous implant materials.

Biomaterials·1996
Same author

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and characteristic mucosal changes in the mouse ileum and cecum.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1995
Same author

Increased expression of cathepsins E and D in reactive microglial cells associated with spongiform degeneration in the brain stem of senescence-accelerated mouse.

Experimental neurology·1995

Bone formation around implants depends on material type and location. Hydroxyapatite and alumina showed better bone integration than zirconia, with periosteal sites yielding the most bone growth.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Bone formation and remodeling around implants are complex processes.
  • Material properties, surface characteristics, and anatomical site influence osseointegration.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective bone regenerative strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate bone formation around three different ceramics: alumina, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite (HA).
  • To evaluate the impact of implant location within the rabbit tibia on bone regeneration.
  • To correlate bone formation with material osteoconductivity and tissue osteogenic capacity.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Ceramics (alumina, zirconia, HA) implanted into the medullary cavity of rabbit tibiae.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Histological analysis of time-dependent bone formation up to 24 weeks post-implantation.
  • Experiment 2: Transcortical implantation of the same ceramics into rabbit tibiae.
  • Quantitative assessment of bone formation at periosteal, endosteal, and marrow cavity sites.

    • Main Results:

    • Bone formation was observed to be dependent on direct contact with the endosteum.
    • Implant location significantly affected bone formation: periosteal sites showed the most bone (approx. 70%), followed by endosteal (approx. 40%), and marrow cavity (approx. 10%).
    • Differences between bioactive and bioinert ceramics were discernible at the material-bone interface.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone formation around ceramic implants is influenced by both the material's osteoconductivity and the surrounding tissue's osteogenic potential.
    • The anatomical site of implantation plays a critical role in the extent of bone regeneration.
    • Hydroxyapatite and alumina demonstrated favorable bone integration compared to zirconia in this study.