Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise

M T Hopman1, W M van Teeffelen, J Brouwer

  • 1Department of Physiology, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands.

European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Impact of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI on Mortality and Quality of Life: A POPular TAVI Substudy.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2025
Same author

Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2025
Same author

Major threats to early safety after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a contemporary cohort of real-world patients.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2021
Same author

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of pre-procedural FEops HEARTguide assessment on device size selection in borderline annulus size cases.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2021
Same author

Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2020
Same author

Incidence and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2020

Mechanical efficiency (ME) during asynchronous arm-cranking exercise (AACE) was higher than synchronous arm-cranking exercise (SACE) at lower power outputs. No significant differences in physiological responses were observed between AACE and SACE at higher intensities.

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Physiology
  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Arm-cranking exercise (ACE) is a valuable tool for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness and for rehabilitation.
  • Understanding the biomechanical and physiological differences between asynchronous (AACE) and synchronous (SACE) arm-cranking exercise is crucial for optimizing training and assessment protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare mechanical efficiency (ME) and physiological responses during AACE and SACE.
  • To determine if exercise intensity influences the differences in ME and physiological responses between AACE and SACE.

Main Methods:

  • Ten healthy males performed submaximal (30, 60, 90 W) and maximal intensity AACE and SACE tests in a counter-balanced order.
  • Mechanical efficiency and key physiological parameters were measured during both exercise conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Gross mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower during SACE compared to AACE at 30 W.
  • No significant differences in ME were observed between AACE and SACE at 60 W and 90 W.
  • Physiological responses to maximal AACE and SACE were not significantly different.

Conclusions:

  • The flywheel mass effect may reduce ME at lower power outputs, particularly during SACE, due to increased compensatory body movements.
  • At higher exercise intensities, the influence of flywheel mass diminishes, leading to comparable ME between AACE and SACE.
  • There are no significant differences in physiological responses between AACE and SACE at higher exercise intensities.