Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Formula-derived prostate volume determination

R G Aarnink1, J J de la Rosette, F M Debruyne

  • 1Department of Urology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

European Urology
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microvessel density: correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer.

European urology·2001
Same author

Can biological markers replace cystoscopy? An update.

Current opinion in urology·2001
Same author

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation as neuromodulative treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Long-term followup of randomized transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral prostatic resection study.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Branching activity in the human prostate: a closer look at the structure of small glandular buds.

European urology·2001
Same author

Intra-prostatic vasculature studies: can they predict the outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the management of bladder outflow obstruction?

The Prostate·2001
Same journal

Re: Twelve-month Results from the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recurrent High-risk NMIBC: One Bladder, Choose Wisely.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Dries Develtere, Riccardo Bertolo. Cumulative Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Radiotherapy: High-Level Long-Term Randomized Evidence. J Clin Oncol. Online ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-00436.

European urology·2026
Same journal

In Memory of Paul Mitrofanoff (1934-2025).

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: McKay RR, Pal S, Xie W, et al. Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference (AUC3) 2025: Expert Consensus on the Management of Renal Cell and Urinary Tract Cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70052.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Ultra-hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: 5-year Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis of the FASTRACK Trials.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Alexander D. Sherry, Van To, Criselle D'souza, et al. Metastasis-directed Therapy With or Without Pembrolizumab for Oligometastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Single-arm Phase 2 Trials. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.03.024.

European urology·2026
See all related articles

Planimetric volumetry is accurate but time-consuming for prostate volume determination. A spheroid formula using average dimensions offers the best alternative for quick, accurate prostate volume assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Prostate volume determination is crucial for diagnosing and managing various urological conditions.
  • Planimetric volumetry, while accurate, is labor-intensive and time-consuming.
  • Accurate and efficient methods for prostate volume assessment are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate formula-derived methods for prostate volume determination.
  • To identify the most accurate and efficient alternative to planimetric volumetry.

Main Methods:

  • Prostate volume was calculated using four different mathematical formulas based on measured dimensions (length, height, width).
  • Planimetric volumetry with a 4 mm step size served as the reference standard.
  • Comparison of formula-derived volumes against planimetric results.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The formula describing a spheroid volume, using half the mean of width, height, and length as the radius, yielded the best results.
  • This spheroid formula demonstrated high accuracy when compared to planimetric volumetry.
  • Other formula-derived methods showed less accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The spheroid formula provides the best alternative to planimetric volumetry for prostate volume assessment.
  • This method offers a balance of speed and reasonable accuracy for clinical use.
  • Planimetric volumetry remains the gold standard for accuracy but is less practical for routine use.