Related Experiment Videos

Two-stage cementless revision THR after infection. 5 recurrences in 40 cases followed 2.5-7 years

K A Lai1, W J Shen, C Y Yang

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Insights

This study revised 40 infected hip prostheses using a two-stage procedure with antibiotics and porous-coated total hip replacement (THR). Results show recurrent infection rates and outcomes comparable to antibiotic cement methods.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Disease Management in Arthroplasty
  • Biomaterials in Orthopedics

Background:

  • Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip replacement (THR) is a significant complication.
  • Two-stage revision surgery is a common approach for managing infected THR.
  • Comparing outcomes of cementless reimplantation with antibiotic-loaded cement is crucial for treatment optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a two-stage revision procedure for infected hip prostheses using delayed cementless implantation.
  • To assess the recurrent infection rate, functional outcomes (Harris hip score), and radiographic results.
  • To compare these outcomes with traditional two-stage procedures utilizing antibiotic-loaded cement.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 40 patients undergoing two-stage revision for infected hip prostheses.
  • Treatment involved intravenous and oral antibiotics, gentamicin beads, and delayed cementless implantation of porous-coated THR.
  • Antibiotic therapy duration was 8 weeks; average resection to reimplantation interval was 48 weeks.

Main Results:

  • 39 patients were followed for an average of 4 years, with 5 experiencing recurrent infection.
  • In patients without recurrent infection, 32 achieved a Harris hip score exceeding 80.
  • Radiographic evaluation showed femoral component migration of 2-6 mm in 3 cases.

Conclusions:

  • The two-stage revision procedure with delayed cementless implantation demonstrates comparable recurrent infection rates to antibiotic cement methods.
  • Functional and radiographic outcomes are favorable and consistent with established two-stage protocols.
  • This approach offers a viable alternative for managing infected hip prostheses.

Related Concept Videos