Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Correcting for exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard

H Brenner1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Germany.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-operative C-reactive protein as a strong independent predictor of long-term colorectal cancer outcomes: consistent findings from two large patient cohorts.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

Genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization analyses provide insights into the causes of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

Sensitivity of a blood ctDNA-based multimodal test for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

Correction: Prediction of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular, mixed, and all-cause dementia by a polygenic risk score and APOE status in a community-based cohort prospectively followed over 17 years.

Molecular psychiatry·2021
Same author

Prediction of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular, mixed, and all-cause dementia by a polygenic risk score and APOE status in a community-based cohort prospectively followed over 17 years.

Molecular psychiatry·2020
Same journal

Temporal Connectivity of Social Contact Networks in Urban and Rural India.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Indoor Radon Concentrations and Hematologic Traits in the Women's Health Initiative.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Non-random selection with and without bias due to selecting on an exposure.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Validation studies in epidemiology can be misleading if the reference standard is imperfect. Using correction procedures for differential misclassification is recommended when the gold standard is alloyed to avoid biased results.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Validation studies are crucial for addressing exposure misclassification in epidemiological research.
  • However, imperfect reference (gold) standards can introduce bias into these validation efforts.
  • This bias can affect estimates of misclassification rates and corrected measures of association.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of imperfect gold standards on exposure misclassification correction methods.
  • To determine appropriate correction strategies when the reference standard is not perfect.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the implications of using an imperfect gold standard in validation studies.
  • It examines how apparent misclassification differs from true misclassification under these conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compares correction procedures for nondifferential versus differential misclassification.

    • Main Results:

    • Basic matrix correction methods for nondifferential misclassification can yield misleading results with imperfect gold standards.
    • Apparent misclassification may be differential even if true misclassification is nondifferential.
    • Correction procedures designed for differential misclassification are more appropriate.

    Conclusions:

    • Epidemiological studies using imperfect gold standards require careful consideration of misclassification.
    • Standard correction methods for nondifferential misclassification may be inappropriate.
    • Employing differential misclassification correction methods is recommended when the gold standard is alloyed.