Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The range of normal

D L Olive1

  • 1Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063, USA.

Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Defining "normal" in medical tests is complex, with two main types: correlated and isolated normality. Understanding these distinctions and using appropriate reference groups is crucial for accurate test interpretation and patient assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Saline contrast sonohysterography and directed extraction, resection and biopsy of intrauterine pathology using a Uterine Explora Curette.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2005
Same author

Cryomyolysis in the management of uterine fibroids: technique and complications.

Surgical technology international·2002
Same author

Treatment of endometriosis.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Benefits of laparoscopy.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
Same author

Legitimizing the stepchild: organizing and expanding fellowship opportunities in endoscopic surgery.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2000
Same author

The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2000
Same journal

Endocrine cancer risks for women during the perimenopause and beyond.

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
Same journal

Aromatase in aging women.

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
Same journal

Reproductive hormones, aging, and sleep.

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
Same journal

Changes in adrenocortical function with aging and therapeutic implications.

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
Same journal

Age-related changes in growth hormone secretion: should the somatopause be treated?

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
Same journal

Menstrual bleeding, hormones, and the menopausal transition.

Seminars in reproductive endocrinology·2000
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Distinguishing normal from abnormal is fundamental to medical testing.
  • The definition of 'normal' is complex and multifaceted.
  • Two primary categories exist: correlated normality and isolated normality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the complexities of defining normality in medical testing.
  • To differentiate between correlated and isolated normality.
  • To highlight the importance of appropriate reference groups and variability in defining normal limits.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of normality definitions.
  • Comparison of correlated and isolated normality frameworks.
  • Discussion of factors influencing the establishment of normal limits.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Isolated normality is more commonly used for defining normal values.
  • Methods for establishing normal limits differ based on the type of normality and test purpose (discovery, exclusion, confirmation).
  • Normal limits should be based on healthy, equivalent reference groups.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate interpretation of medical tests requires a clear understanding of normality definitions.
  • Consideration of intrapersonal and interindividual variations is essential.
  • The choice of normality type and reference group significantly impacts test validity.