Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Introducing an innovative method in team conferences

F Jelles1, C A Van Bennekom, G J Lankhorst

  • 1University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Disability and Rehabilitation
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study.

Accountability in research·2023
Same author

COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study.

BMC medical research methodology·2020
Same author

Selective citation in scientific literature on the human health effects of bisphenol A.

Research integrity and peer review·2019
Same author

COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2018
Same author

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2018
Same author

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2017
Same journal

Optimising access to the New South Wales Mid North Coast Brain Injury Service for local aboriginal people (Dunghutti Muri project): a participatory action research study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Egyptian-Arabic version of ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire: a cross-cultural study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Patient's perspectives on the value of peer support after acquired brain injury: an exploratory study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Aligning interprofessional collaboration in sick leave and return-to-work guidance: development of the ICF-based WARD instrument and guideline.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Effects of non-invasive therapies for the treatment of phantom limb pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Understanding patients' experiences and needs around decision-making for bulbar symptom management at a multidisciplinary ALS clinic.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

The Rehabilitation Activities Profile report system (RAP-TEAM) was introduced to improve multidisciplinary team conferences. While initial professional satisfaction was mixed, benefits were reported, suggesting change processes require adequate time.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Multidisciplinary team conferences are crucial in rehabilitation medicine.
  • Structuring these conferences effectively can enhance patient care and team collaboration.
  • The Rehabilitation Activities Profile report system (RAP-TEAM) was developed as an innovative approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the introduction of the RAP-TEAM system.
  • To evaluate the effects of RAP-TEAM on the satisfaction of healthcare professionals.
  • To identify challenges and provide recommendations for implementing innovative changes in healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

  • The RAP-TEAM system was implemented in three distinct multidisciplinary teams.
  • Professional satisfaction was assessed before and after the introduction of RAP-TEAM.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative and quantitative data were likely collected to understand experiences and outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • RAP-TEAM did not significantly influence professional satisfaction in two of the three teams.
    • Professional satisfaction decreased in one team following RAP-TEAM implementation.
    • Despite mixed satisfaction results, professionals reported more benefits than disadvantages associated with RAP-TEAM.

    Conclusions:

    • The introduction of innovative methods like RAP-TEAM requires sufficient time for adaptation and effectiveness.
    • Successful implementation of change in healthcare necessitates full attention and awareness from all stakeholders.
    • Further research with longer follow-up periods may be needed to fully ascertain the impact of RAP-TEAM.