Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Model studies in tumor incidence

F A Popp

    Archiv Fur Geschwulstforschung
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Two models predicting tumor latency periods align with empirical data. A proliferation control model better explains chemical carcinogenesis than a single-cell damage model.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Low-level luminescence of the human skin.

    Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)·2016
    Same author

    Biophoton emission of human body.

    Indian journal of experimental biology·2004
    Same author

    Ultraweak photon emission in assessing bone growth factor efficiency using fibroblastic differentiation.

    Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology·2001
    Same author

    [Ultraweak emissions from chicken eggs and embryos: the nonadditive interaction of 2 emitters and stable nonequilibrium].

    Ontogenez·1997
    Same author

    Biophoton emission of the human body.

    Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology·1997
    Same author

    Spontaneous and light-induced photon emission from intact brains of chick embryos.

    Science in China. Series C, Life sciences·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Toxicology
    • Biomathematics

    Background:

    • Tumorigenesis involves complex cellular processes.
    • Understanding the latency period is crucial for predicting cancer risk.
    • Carcinogenic compound dose influences tumor development time.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare two mathematical models of tumor incidence.
    • To evaluate models based on single-cell damage versus proliferation control.
    • To determine which model better predicts latency periods for chemical carcinogenesis.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed two theoretical models for tumor incidence.
    • Modeled latency period as a function of carcinogenic dose.
    • Compared model predictions to empirical data from Bryan and Shimkin.

    Main Results:

    • Both models yielded a similar dose-latency relationship.
    • This relationship matched established empirical observations.
    • The proliferation control model showed better agreement with observed latency periods.

    Conclusions:

    • The proliferation control model provides a superior framework for understanding chemical carcinogenesis.
    • Disturbances in cell proliferation are key to chemical carcinogenesis.
    • Single-cell damage models are less effective for explaining chemical carcinogenesis dynamics.

    Related Experiment Videos