Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry

J Borg1, A Møllgaard, B J Riis

  • 1Osteometer A/S, Rødovre, Denmark.

Osteoporosis International : a Journal Established As Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

A new single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) device for forearm bone mass measurement shows improved precision over single photon absorptiometry (SPA). This validated SXA device is suitable for diagnosing and monitoring bone density treatments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observation of the ϒ(3S) Meson and Suppression of ϒ States in Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Probing Small Bjorken-x Nuclear Gluonic Structure via Coherent J/ψ Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Measurement of the top quark mass using a profile likelihood approach with the lepton + jets final states in proton-proton collisions at <math></math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2023
Same author

Observation of τ Lepton Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at <math></math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2023
Same author

Measurement of the Dependence of the Hadron Production Fraction Ratios f_{s}/f_{u} and f_{d}/f_{u} on B Meson Kinematic Variables in Proton-Proton Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2023

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Bone Densitometry
  • Osteoporosis Research

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of forearm bone mass is crucial for diagnosing osteoporosis and monitoring treatment efficacy.
  • Traditional methods like single photon absorptiometry (SPA) have limitations in precision and accuracy.
  • Advancements in imaging technology are needed to improve bone densitometry assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a new single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) device for forearm bone mass measurement.
  • To compare the performance of the new SXA device with the established SPA technique.
  • To assess the precision and accuracy of SXA for forearm bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD).

Main Methods:

  • The study utilized a new SXA device (DTX-100) and a traditional SPA device (DT 100) for forearm bone mass measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Phantom measurements were conducted to assess the precision errors of both SPA and SXA.
  • Patient measurements were performed on 377 individuals, comparing SPA and SXA results, as well as dominant and non-dominant forearm measurements.

    • Main Results:

    • SXA demonstrated lower phantom measurement precision errors (0.30% for BMC, 0.30% for BMD) compared to SPA (0.43% for BMC, 0.42% for BMD).
    • Patient measurements showed superior SXA precision (0.56% for BMC, 0.83% for BMD) versus SPA (0.85% for BMC, 0.99% for BMD).
    • High correlations were found between SPA and SXA (r=0.99 for BMC, r=0.98 for BMD), and between dominant and non-dominant forearm SXA measurements (r=0.95).

    Conclusions:

    • The new SXA forearm bone densitometer exhibits excellent performance characteristics, including high precision and accuracy.
    • The SXA device demonstrates significant advantages over SPA for forearm bone mass assessment.
    • The validated SXA technology is suitable for both diagnostic purposes and for monitoring treatment response in patients with bone density concerns.