Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026
Photoselective Vaporesection of the Prostate via an End-firing Lithium Triborate Crystal Laser
Published on: May 9, 2018
A step towards day case prostatectomy
1Department of Urology, South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Objective:
To compare laser prostatectomy, using both side-fire and contact lasers, with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to identify the advantages and disadvantages of all three in the short-and long-term (1 year).
Patients And Methods:
Forty patients were randomized into one of four groups undergoing TURP, side-fire laser prostatectomy alone, side-fire with debridement and contact laser prostatectomy. Strict entry criteria ensured that no patients with malignancy were selected. The patients were reviewed after 3, 6 and 12 months.
Results:
The duration of operation and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in those undergoing laser side-fire treatment than those undergoing TURP. However, the early (3-month) symptom score was significantly worse in those treated by side-fire laser than in those treated by side-fire laser with debridement. After 1 year there was no significant difference in mean symptom score and mean urinary flow rate among the four groups.
Conclusion:
Laser prostatectomy offers the prospect of a shorter theatre and hospital stay and, by debriding the thermocoagulated tissue, the early irritative symptoms were reduced, with a significant improvement in symptom score after 3 months in patients with small prostates.
