Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial filter combination in human pattern vision: channel interactions revealed by adaptation

T S Meese1, M A Georgeson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bristol, UK.

Perception
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.

Neuroscience·2007
Same author

Performance data indicate summation for pictorial depth-cues in slanted surfaces.

Spatial vision·2004
Same author

Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data.

Vision research·2002
Same author

Spatial coherence does not affect contrast discrimination for multiple Gabor stimuli.

Perception·2002
Same author

Independent detectors for expansion and rotation, and for orthogonal components of deformation.

Perception·2001
Same author

Broad direction bandwidths for complex motion mechanisms.

Vision research·2001

Perceptual combination of visual stimuli depends on interactions between spatial channels. Remote channels influence whether complex patterns cohere or segment, challenging simple filter models.

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Perceptual psychology

Background:

  • Conventional models struggle with orientation coding of superimposed gratings (plaids).
  • Perceived structure in static plaids suggests stimulus-dependent spatial filter output combination.
  • Understanding cross-channel interactions is key to explaining perceptual combination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate cross-channel interactions in spatial filter combination using adaptation.
  • Determine the role of remote spatial channels in plaid perception.

Main Methods:

  • Selective adaptation paradigm using superimposed sinusoidal gratings (plaids).
  • Two aftereffects were measured: adaptation with intermediate vs. matching component orientations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested effects of adapting to different spatial frequencies (1 vs. 3 cycles deg-1).

    • Main Results:

    • Adaptation to intermediate orientations disrupted perceptual combination of test plaid components.
    • Adaptation to a different spatial frequency (3 cycles deg-1) facilitated combination of test plaid components.
    • Results indicate involvement of spatial channels beyond those optimally tuned to the test stimulus.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial channels remote from the primary stimulus orientation significantly influence plaid perception.
    • Perceptual segmentation or coherence of plaids is mediated by these broader cross-channel interactions.
    • Findings challenge models relying solely on narrowly tuned, labelled linear filters for orientation coding.