Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Protocol for HER2 FISH Using a Non-cross-linking, Formalin-free Tissue Fixative to Combine Advantages of Cryo-preservation and Formalin Fixation
Published on: December 25, 2017
Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in cytologic specimens using various fixatives
J A Hudock1, C A Hanau, R Christen
1Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract:
Estrogen and progesterone receptor reactivity may be useful in identifying possible primary sites of metastatic disease or directing therapy in tumors of the female genital tract, including breast, ovary, and endometrium. Various methods have been described for the immunocytochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of cytologic specimens but our results have been variable. We evaluated the effectiveness of various fixatives [cytospin collection fluid, Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA (SH); ethanol (ETH); and formalin (FOR)] for fixation of smears (SM) and cell block (CB) material. The percentage and intensity of tumor nuclei of SM, CB, and tissue sections (TS) stained for ER and PR by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique were compared. Samples were considered ER or PR positive when > or = 20% of tumor nuclei were stained. The sensitivity of ER analysis of SMs and CBs in each fixative compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were as follows: SM (SH) 88%, SM (ETH) 14%, CB (SH) 58%, CB (ETH) 43%, and CB (FOR) 70%. The sensitivity of PR determination on SMs and CBs was SM (SH) 71%, SM (ETH) 6.0%, CB (SH) 25%, CB (ETH) 33%, CB (FOR) 80%. These findings indicate that of the fixatives evaluated for ER analysis, SMs fixed in SH provided the best results. For PR evaluation, CBs fixed in FOR gave the best results.

