Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture

L C Breeding1, D L Dixon, J P Sadler

  • 1Department of Oral Health Practice, College of Densitry, University of Kentucky, USA.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated implant-supported fixed partial denture designs. Results showed that different designs did not significantly alter natural tooth abutment movement during simulated function.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Birds as bioindicators of plastic pollution in terrestrial and freshwater environments: A 30-year review.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2024
Same author

Pharmacologic strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Journal of internal medicine·2019
Same author

Biodiversity in urban habitat patches.

The Science of the total environment·2005
Same author

Leadership and culture alignment. Seven practical steps can help leaders bring different cultures together.

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·2001
Same author

Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2000
Same author

Building organizational fitness.

Health Forum journal·2000

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials and Biomechanics
  • Dental Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPPDs) present biomechanical challenges due to the rigid fixation of implants versus the mobile nature of natural tooth abutments with their periodontal ligaments.
  • Differential movement between implant and tooth abutments is a key consideration in FPPD design, leading to debate between rigid and non-rigid configurations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an in vitro method for evaluating the biomechanical performance of different FPPD designs.
  • To measure the movement of a natural tooth abutment under simulated functional loading in response to varying FPPD designs.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an in vitro testing apparatus to simulate functional forces on FPPDs.
  • Measurement of natural tooth abutment displacement and mobility using the developed testing system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of tooth movement between rigid and non-rigid FPPD designs.

    • Main Results:

    • The study found no substantial difference in the movement of the natural tooth abutment across the tested fixed partial denture designs.
    • In vitro measurements indicated that biomechanical compensation for differential movement was not significantly influenced by the rigidity of the FPPD design.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between rigid and non-rigid fixed partial denture designs may not significantly impact natural tooth abutment mobility during function.
    • Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the long-term clinical implications of different FPPD designs on abutment tooth vitality and prosthesis success.