Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks

G R Parr1, L K Gardner

  • 1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic retrieval analyses of implanted biomaterials retrieved from humans and experimental animals.

The Journal of oral implantology·2001
Same author

Effects of triclosan on the cytotoxicity and fungal growth on a soft denture liner.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2001
Same author

The biologic tissue responses to uncoated and coated implanted biomaterials.

Advances in dental research·2001
Same author

Physical-property comparison of a chairside- or laboratory-polymerized permanent soft-liner during 1 year.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2000
Same author

Dental considerations in upper airway sleep disorders: A review of the literature.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1999
Same author

Retrieval analyses of implanted biomaterials: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses of implants retrieved from humans.

The Journal of oral implantology·1999

Swing-lock (S/L) obturator prostheses offer a conservative approach for restoring maxillary defects. This review compares conventional and S/L designs, highlighting S/L

Area of Science:

  • Maxillofacial prosthetics
  • Dental implantology
  • Restorative dentistry

Background:

  • Maxillary defects pose significant challenges in restoration.
  • Conventional obturator prostheses are effective but may lack flexibility.
  • Swing-lock (S/L) obturator prostheses offer a less invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review conventional obturator framework designs.
  • To compare conventional and S/L obturator designs for maxillary defects.
  • To provide guidance for practitioners considering S/L modality.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of conventional obturator framework designs.
  • Comparison of conventional and S/L obturator designs.
  • Analysis of S/L design variations (single, double, dual labial bars).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Swing-lock (S/L) obturator prostheses provide a conservative design option.
  • S/L designs offer flexibility, reducing stress on abutment teeth.
  • Various labial bar designs are possible for S/L obturators based on defect complexity.

Conclusions:

  • Swing-lock (S/L) obturator prostheses are effective for restoring maxillary defects.
  • The S/L modality presents a viable alternative to conventional designs and extensive reconstruction.
  • Further clinical information and practitioner guidance are needed for optimal S/L obturator utilization.