Related Experiment Videos
The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1563, USA.
Brain and Cognition
|August 1, 1996
Summary
This study on the Stroop effect suggests interference occurs late in processing. Hemispheric specialization was found, with the left hemisphere showing greater Stroop interference, particularly in males.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The classic Stroop effect, a well-known cognitive phenomenon, still presents several unresolved questions.
- These include the precise processing stage responsible for the effect, the impact of procedural variations, and the role of brain lateralization and individual differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the processing stage of the Stroop effect.
- To examine the influence of procedural manipulations on Stroop interference.
- To explore hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interactions in the Stroop task.
- To identify potential individual differences, particularly related to sex and menstrual cycle phase.
Main Methods:
- A series of experiments were conducted using central, lateral, and bilateral presentations of Stroop stimuli.
- Manual and vocal response modes were employed to assess processing stages.
- Stimuli were presented to different visual fields to investigate hemispheric specialization.
- 146 right-handed participants, with a balanced sex distribution, were involved.
Main Results:
- Manual responses reduced but did not eliminate Stroop interference, supporting a late processing stage.
- Unilateral or bilateral separation of color patch and word did not significantly alter interference magnitude, suggesting no significant interhemispheric transfer cost.
- Evidence for hemispheric specialization was found, with greater Stroop interference observed in the left hemisphere.
- This laterality effect interacted with sex, with males and females in a low estrogen phase showing greater left-hemisphere interference.
Conclusions:
- The Stroop effect likely arises from a late stage of cognitive processing.
- Interhemispheric transfer does not appear to be a significant factor in Stroop interference for most individuals.
- Hemispheric specialization plays a role, with the left hemisphere being more involved in processing Stroop interference.
- Sex and hormonal fluctuations (estrogen levels) can modulate the observed hemispheric asymmetry in Stroop interference.