Hormonal, water balance, and electrolyte changes during sixty-day confinement

The EXEMSI experiment has made it clear that it is difficult to perform psychological and physiological protocols satisfactorily in the same study. It is, therefore, essential that the objectives of study be defined clearly before the start. While behavioral and psychological studies may be possible and provide valid results for a small group of mixed gender, it is more difficult to conduct valid physiological studies due to large differences between individuals and even in the same individual over time. As stated before, it is unusual in space research on humans and even during space simulation studies to have large and homogeneous groups of subjects. The consequence is that the results remain tentative. For a better understanding of the physiological data collected during the ISEMSI ad EXEMSI experiments, they should be correlated with the results of the psychological studies. One of the conclusions drawn from the ISEMSI experiment was that confinement provides a valuable parallel to other simulations of weightlessness, such as bedrest. The same pattern of changes in parameters like the blood volume regulating hormones renin and aldosterone was observed as in bedrest. After the EXEMSI study we can say that the conditions imposed by confinement, high work load, and stress, potentiate these effects. This implies that in using head-down bedrest as a weightlessness simulation the confinement effects must be identified by setting adequate control conditions for the head-down position, for short-term as well as for long-term simulations. Indeed, we have seen in the two isolation studies that confinement may have its effects at the beginning of the isolation period (EXEMSI) as well as during the entire isolation period (ISEMSI). In planning for EXEMSI we wanted to obtain more insight in some of the phenomena observed during ISEMSI by the introduction of new techniques such as the doubly labeled water method for determination of total body water. However, in some cases the opposite effects of those encountered in ISEMSI were found. This was probably due to the many changes in the experimental scenario, like number of subjects, mixed gender, living space per subject, and workload. Thus, for future isolation studies the operational scenario should be better examined and preferably standardized. Nevertheless, in such studies as well as in long-term sojourns in a space station, the crew size will not be larger than that of the EXEMSI crew. Physiologists will, therefore, have to become familiar with the study of small groups of subjects and to try to overcome the problems of large individual differences and statistical analysis of data from small groups.