Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing?

E Schröger1

  • 1Institute of Psychology, University of Munich, Germany. schroger@mip.paed.uni-muenchen.de

Hearing Research
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial auditory regularity encoding and prediction: Human middle-latency and long-latency auditory evoked potentials.

Brain research·2015
Same author

A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.

Brain research·2012
Same author

Spectrotemporal processing drives fast access to memory traces for spoken words.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

The European journal of neuroscience·2009
Same author

Selective tuning of cortical sound-feature processing by language experience.

The European journal of neuroscience·2006

This study used mismatch negativity (MMN) to investigate auditory sensory memory for internal differences in time (IDT) and sound pressure level (IDL). Findings suggest binaural location cues are processed in parallel at the cortical level.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Auditory sensory memory is crucial for processing complex soundscapes.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) serves as a reliable electrophysiological marker for pre-attentive auditory memory.
  • Internal differences in time (IDT) and sound pressure level (IDL) are key binaural cues for sound localization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural processing of internal differences in time (IDT) and sound pressure level (IDL).
  • To determine if IDT and IDL are processed in parallel or sequentially in the auditory cortex.
  • To examine the role of mismatch negativity (MMN) in reflecting the pre-attentive processing of these binaural cues.

Main Methods:

  • A passive oddball paradigm was employed using auditory stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Standard stimuli lacked IDT and IDL, while deviant stimuli varied in IDT, IDL, or both.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) was recorded to assess pre-attentive auditory sensory memory.

    • Main Results:

    • MMNs were elicited by all deviant stimuli, confirming the establishment of memory representations for IDT and IDL.
    • The MMN amplitude was significantly larger for the combined IDT-IDL deviant compared to individual IDT or IDL deviants.
    • MMN characteristics (latency, amplitude, topography) for the combined deviant closely resembled the sum of MMNs for individual deviants.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the hypothesis that representations of IDT and IDL are processed in parallel within the auditory system.
    • Separate cortical representations for IDT and IDL are likely involved in sound localization.
    • MMN is a valuable tool for understanding the parallel processing of complex auditory features.