White-coat hypertension and cardiac organ damage in elderly subjects

The aim of this study was comparing the cardiac mass in elderly normotensive subjects and elderly white-coat hypertensive patients by examining in perspective, in consecutive patients, office blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP, and echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass.

We studied 42 elderly patients attending a hypertension unit: of these, 22 (mean age 68.7 +/- 3.2 years) had persistent > 90 mm Hg office diastolic blood pressure (DBP), > 140 mm Hg systolic blood pressure (SBP) and < 142/90 mm Hg daytime ambulatory BP (white-coat positives); the remaining 20 (mean age 67.4 +/- 2.2 years) had < 90 mm Hg office DBP, < 140 mm Hg SBP and < 142/90 mm Hg daytime ambulatory BP (normotensives). White coat-patients (n = 22) were selected from a series of 75 consecutive newly diagnosed and never treated patients with mild hypertension (casual DBP constantly between 90 mm Hg and 105 mm Hg).

Neither left ventricular mass index (89.9 +/- 23.1 vs 91.8 +/-25.4 P = NS and +/- 25.4 P = NS) and left ventricular mass/height, (115.4 +/- 17.1 vs 119.6 +/- 18.3 P = NS), nor relative wall thickness (0.31 +/- 0.44 vs 0.33 +/- 0.05 P = NS) were significantly higher in white-coat hypertensives as against normotensives. Neither did we find a relevant difference between left atrial diameters in the above considered groups (3.28 +/- 0.41 vs 3.32 +/- 0.37). In fact 81.8% of white-coat hypertensives had left ventricular normal geometry; whilst 13.6% only had concentric remodeling. Age and sex were associated with left ventricular mass index, left ventricular mass/height and relative wall thickness. Multiple regression analysis revealed that it is ambulatory, not office BP that carries independent information about relative wall thickness and left ventricular mass indices.

Since elderly white-coat hypertensive subjects did not display a greater cardiac involvement than age-matched normotensives, they should be treated as such.