Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The discriminability of local surface structure

J F Norman1, J T Todd

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. fnorman@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu

Perception
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The great power of steady misrepresentation: Behaviorism's presumed denial of instinct.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

The history of behavior analysis: Some historiography and a bibliography.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Tempered with a harsh word: Harzem's review of modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

The early research of John B. Watson: Before the behavioral revolution.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same journal

Skeletal structure and makeup effects in facial attractiveness judgments.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Human observers struggle to perceive depth and orientation differences, even with multiple visual cues. Surface orientation is easier to discern than depth, suggesting separate visual system representations for each.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Human visual perception relies on multiple cues like shading, texture, motion, and binocular disparity.
  • Accurate depth and surface orientation discrimination are crucial for object recognition and navigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human observers' ability to discriminate depth and surface orientation differences.
  • To explore the impact of multiple visual cues on performance.
  • To determine if depth and orientation information are processed separately.

Main Methods:

  • Observers viewed objects with simultaneous cues (shading, texture, motion, binocular disparity).
  • Performance was measured using Weber fractions for depth and orientation discriminations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The effect of region separation in the projected image was analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Observer performance was relatively poor across all conditions (Weber fractions 10%-40%).
    • Surface orientation discrimination yielded lower Weber fractions than depth discrimination.
    • Orientation discrimination was invariant to region separation, while depth discrimination was highly sensitive to it.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite abundant visual cues, depth and orientation discrimination abilities are limited.
    • Separate processing streams for depth and surface orientation are suggested by performance differences.
    • These findings imply distinct neural representations for depth and orientation within the human visual system.