Related Experiment Videos

Clinical use of centrifugal pumps and the roller pump in open heart surgery: a comparative evaluation

M Yoshikai1, M Hamada, K Takarabe

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Koga Hospital, Kurume, Japan.

Artificial Organs
|June 1, 1996
PubMed

Insights

Centrifugal pumps showed fewer negative impacts on blood elements and coagulation compared to roller pumps during cardiopulmonary bypass. Specifically, centrifugal pumps resulted in lower thrombin-antithrombin complex levels, suggesting reduced thrombin generation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Hematology

Background:

  • Centrifugal pumps are preferred in open heart surgery for minimizing blood damage and coagulation activation.
  • Previous research indicates potential benefits of centrifugal pumps over roller pumps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of two centrifugal pump types and one roller pump on blood elements and the coagulation system during cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • To evaluate impacts on complements and immunoglobulins.

Main Methods:

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 29 patients using either a Lifestream or BP-80 centrifugal pump, or a Mera Co. roller pump.
  • Measurements included platelet counts, lactate dehydrogenase, antithrombin III, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), complements (C3, C4, CH50), and immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) pre- and post-bypass.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed among the pump types for most parameters measured.
  • Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) values increased significantly less in patients using centrifugal pumps compared to those using the roller pump.

Conclusions:

  • Centrifugal pumps may suppress thrombin synthesis more effectively than roller pumps during cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • This suggests centrifugal pumps could offer improved hemocompatibility in cardiac surgery.

Related Concept Videos