Related Experiment Videos
Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results
1Department of Psychology, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
|February 1, 1996
Summary
Facilitated Communication (FC) effectiveness varied among students with autism. Some students became more passive communicators, showing less independent communication when using FC.
Area of Science:
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Communication Sciences and Disorders
Background:
- Facilitated Communication (FC) is a method to support individuals with communication impairments.
- Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and related disorders often present significant communication challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate individual variations in the effectiveness of Facilitated Communication (FC).
- To assess the validity of FC in enhancing communication for students with autism and related disorders.
Main Methods:
- Examined 20 students with autism and related disorders over 6 weeks, with follow-up up to 7 months.
- Utilized multiple communication methods including auditory/visual input, pointing, and typing to mitigate single-method limitations.
- Collected data on FC effectiveness compared to independent communication.
Main Results:
- Findings varied across different communication methods.
- Little clear support was found for FC enhancing communication beyond independent efforts.
- Significant facilitator influence was observed, but less extensive than in prior studies.
- An 'abdication' pattern emerged in some students, showing reduced performance with FC compared to independent communication.
Conclusions:
- Individual effectiveness of FC varies significantly.
- FC may lead to more passive communication in some students with autism.
- Complex influences and potential risk factors in FC require careful consideration.