Related Experiment Videos
Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production
1Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Sweden.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 1, 1996
Summary
Speech perception is not a passive recording of sound. Listener adaptations and multimodal information shape how we interpret phonetic signals, challenging the idea of direct acoustic encoding.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Linguistics
- Auditory Neuroscience
Background:
- Speech perception research traditionally focuses on signal properties.
- The role of nonsignal information and listener-specific factors is increasingly recognized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the interplay between signal properties and nonsignal information in speech perception.
- To challenge the notion that phonetic perception is a direct, knowledge-innocent decoding of the acoustic signal.
- To explore the function of speech signals in light of adaptive speech production.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence from speech perception and production studies.
- Theoretical analysis of the relationship between acoustic signals, articulatory processes, and listener perception.
- Examination of the concept of phonetic invariants.
Main Results:
- Phonetic percepts are influenced by listener-dependent adaptations and multimodal information, not solely by raw acoustic data.
- Speech production is adaptively organized, suggesting signals supplement, rather than encode, invariant information.
- Evidence questions the necessity of intermediate articulatory representations in speech perception.
Conclusions:
- Phonetic signals are not simple acoustic invariants but are shaped by listener-specific adaptations.
- The speech signal acts as a supplement to a listener's existing processing system.
- Listener-dependent transformations of speech patterns are principled and interpretable.