Related Experiment Videos
Short biphasic pulses from 90 microfarad capacitors lower defibrillation threshold
C D Swerdlow1, R M Kass, S Davie
1Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|July 1, 1996
Summary
Shorter, 90 microfarad (μF) biphasic pulses reduced defibrillation threshold (DFT) energy compared to conventional 120 μF pulses. This optimization for defibrillation energy, using 90 μF-50% tilt pulses, did not increase voltage requirements.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Defibrillation threshold (DFT) is crucial for effective electrical cardioversion.
- Conventional 120 microfarad (μF) capacitors with truncated exponential pulses have established DFTs.
- Shorter pulse durations from smaller capacitors (e.g., 60 μF) can lower DFT but may increase voltage demands.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if intermediate-sized 90 μF capacitors could reduce DFT energy without increasing voltage requirements.
- To compare the efficacy of 90 μF-50% tilt and 90 μF-65% tilt biphasic pulses against conventional 120 μF-65% tilt pulses.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 20 patients undergoing defibrillator implantation.
- Biphasic waveform DFTs were measured using 120 μF-65% tilt, 90 μF-65% tilt, and 90 μF-50% tilt capacitor configurations.
- Analysis included stored energy DFT, voltage DFT, and assessment across different pathway resistances.
Main Results:
- The 90 μF-50% tilt pulses demonstrated a significantly lower stored energy DFT (9.1 ± 4.3 J) compared to both 120 μF-65% tilt (12.0 ± 5.5 J) and 90 μF-65% tilt (11.6 ± 5.8 J) pulses (P < 0.005).
- Voltage DFTs for 90 μF-50% tilt pulses were comparable to 120 μF-65% tilt pulses, while 90 μF-65% tilt pulses required higher voltages.
- In patients with higher resistance pathways, 90 μF-50% tilt pulses significantly reduced DFT energy compared to 120 μF-65% tilt pulses.
Conclusions:
- Biphasic 90 μF-50% tilt pulses effectively reduce stored energy DFT compared to conventional 120 μF-65% tilt pulses without increasing voltage DFT.
- The 90 μF-65% tilt pulse configuration offered no significant advantage over the conventional 120 μF-65% tilt pulses.
- Optimizing capacitor size and pulse tilt can improve defibrillation energy efficiency, particularly in patients with higher impedance pathways.