Related Experiment Videos
A comparative study using prepared and unprepared frozen semen for donor insemination
L R Pistorius1, T F Kruger, A de Villiers
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa.
Archives of Andrology
|January 1, 1996
Summary
Intrauterine insemination with prepared donor semen is more effective than pericervical insemination with unprepared semen for achieving pregnancy. This finding supports intrauterine insemination as a preferred treatment option for donor insemination.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Infertility Treatments
- Assisted Reproductive Technology
Background:
- Therapeutic donor insemination is a common treatment for infertility.
- The method of semen preparation and insemination technique can impact pregnancy rates.
- Optimizing donor insemination protocols is crucial for improving success rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of pericervical insemination with unprepared donor semen versus intrauterine insemination with prepared donor semen.
- To evaluate pregnancy rates in a prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial.
- To determine the optimal number of treatment cycles before considering alternative therapies.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, crossover trial involving 54 patients undergoing therapeutic donor insemination.
- Patients were randomized to receive either intrauterine insemination with prepared donor semen or pericervical insemination with unprepared donor semen in alternating cycles.
- Semen preparation involved double wash and swim-up techniques for intrauterine insemination.
Main Results:
- Intrauterine insemination with prepared semen resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (20.4% per cycle) compared to pericervical insemination with unprepared semen (3.4% per cycle, p = .005).
- Pregnancy rates per cycle were 13.2% (1st cycle), 17.4% (2nd cycle), 13.2% (3rd cycle), 7.1% (4th cycle), and 4.8% (after 4th cycle).
- A decline in pregnancy rates was observed after the fourth treatment cycle.
Conclusions:
- Intrauterine insemination with prepared donor semen is a more effective method for achieving pregnancy in therapeutic donor insemination.
- The study supports the use of prepared semen and intrauterine insemination as a primary treatment strategy.
- Considering alternative therapies after four failed cycles of therapeutic donor insemination is recommended due to decreasing success rates.