Histological analysis of aggressiveness and responsiveness in Wilms' tumor

The clinical behavior and outcome for any neoplasm are determined originally by its aggressiveness. As adjuvant therapy becomes increasingly effective for that neoplasm, responsiveness to therapy assumes a larger role in determining outcome. Wilms' tumor (WT) provides instructive examples of the dissociation of aggressiveness from responsiveness. The presence of gigantic nuclei with multipolar mitotic figures (anaplasia) appears to be a marker of resistance to therapy, but not of increased aggressiveness. For this reason, anaplasia in a stage 1 WT and anaplasia confined to discrete foci within the primary tumor have no adverse prognostic significance following surgical resection. The prognostic significance of anaplasia is apparently limited to those patients in whom anaplastic cells remain following attempted surgical resection. WT with predominantly epithelial differentiation usually have a low degree of aggressiveness. In this study, 81.3% of WT with this pattern were stage 1. This feature accounts for the high cure rate associated with this pattern prior to the advent of effective adjuvant therapy. However, epithelial predominant WT that present with advanced stage disease may be quite resistant to therapy, with relapse and death rates higher than for more aggressive WT patterns. In contrast, the diffuse blastemal pattern is associated with marked aggressiveness, but with high survival rates suggesting it is usually responsive to current therapy. These features illustrate the independence of aggressiveness and responsiveness in determining outcome for some patients with cancer. Grading systems must be reevaluated with each significant change in therapy. In order to formulate rational therapy, it is important to determine whether prognostic markers are associated with aggressiveness or responsiveness.