Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Authors: who contributes what?

B P Squires

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
    |October 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Medical faculty often misunderstand research authorship, leading to confusion in collaborative studies. Clearer contributor identification is needed to ensure honest attribution in published research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    1. Introduction.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    SLSA program.

    Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1998
    Same author

    Peer review under scrutiny. Report on the third International Congress in Prague, 1997.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·1998
    Same author

    Plus ça change...

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1998
    Same author

    Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

    Clinical performance and quality health care·1997
    Same author

    Divide and conquer.

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Research Ethics
    • Scientific Publishing

    Background:

    • Investigates perceptions of faculty involvement in medical research among pediatric department chairs and deans.
    • Highlights widespread confusion regarding authorship in collaborative medical research.
    • Examines current authorship guidelines and proposed alternatives.

    Discussion:

    • Discusses the ambiguity surrounding authorship in multi-author research papers.
    • Compares the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' guidelines with proposed changes.
    • Addresses the need for explicit descriptions of individual contributions.

    Key Insights:

    • Pediatric department leaders perceive faculty involvement in research with notable confusion regarding authorship.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Current authorship practices may not accurately reflect individual contributions in collaborative research.
  • There is a consensus on the need for clearer identification of contributors in scientific publications.

    • Outlook:

    • Recommends exploring modified authorship guidelines that explicitly detail each investigator's role.
    • Encourages continued dialogue between researchers and editors to refine authorship criteria.
    • Advocates for transparent and accurate attribution to uphold research integrity.