Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MAST 96

A K Chang1, J Dunford, D B Hoyt

  • 1Trauma Research and Education Foundation, San Diego County Database, University of California, School of Medicine, USA.

The Journal of Emergency Medicine
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CLOCK is a substrate of SUMO and sumoylation of CLOCK upregulates the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-α.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

Pain in the aftermath of trauma is a risk factor for post-traumatic stress disorder.

Psychological medicine·2007
Same author

Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center.

Injury·2002
Same author

Anatomic exposures for vascular injuries.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2002
Same author

Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review.

The Journal of trauma·2001
Same author

Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial.

The Journal of trauma·2001
Same journal

Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Causing Traumatic Cardiothoracic and Abdominal Injuries: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Drip-and-Ship versus Mothership Model in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Stratified by Stroke System Integration.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Response to: "Letter to the Editor Regarding Cervical Spine Clearance in Adult and Pediatric Trauma: A Systematic Review".

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound Characterization of the Distal Thigh Great Saphenous Vein Dimensions in Children and Adults: Implications for Peripheral Rescue Access.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

A Shadow in the Right Ventricle.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Structural Determinants of Telehealth Use Among Patients Presenting to an Urban Safety-Net Emergency Department.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Military Anti-Shock Trousers (MAST suits) are still mandated in many states despite limited clinical utility. Usage has significantly declined, suggesting policy should guide use, not legislation.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Trauma Care
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • The Military Anti-Shock Trouser (MAST) suit is a device used to support blood pressure in hypotensive trauma patients.
  • Previous human studies indicate limited clinical utility for the MAST suit.
  • Controversy exists regarding the necessity and efficacy of MAST suit deployment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the current usage of MAST suits across all 50 State Emergency Medical Services in the United States.
  • To analyze the trend in MAST suit usage in San Diego County over a seven-year period.
  • To evaluate the basis for continued MAST suit expenditure despite evidence gaps.

Main Methods:

  • A telephone survey was conducted with all 50 State Emergency Medical Services.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data on MAST suit usage and inflation rates were collected.
  • Trends in San Diego County from 1987 to 1993 were analyzed.
  • Main Results:

    • 60% of states (30 states) still mandate carrying MAST suits on ambulances.
    • In San Diego County, MAST suit inflations for hypotensive blunt trauma patients decreased from 37% in 1987 to 2% in 1993.
    • Despite a lack of supporting efficacy data, states continue resource allocation for MAST suits.

    Conclusions:

    • MAST suit usage has significantly declined, reflecting a potential shift in clinical practice.
    • Continued state mandates for MAST suits appear disconnected from evidence of efficacy.
    • Clinical use of MAST suits should be guided by medical control philosophy, not legislative requirements.