A lumped parameter model to evaluate the fluid dynamics of different coronary bypasses

R Pietrabissa1, S Mantero, T Marotta

  • 1Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.

Insights

Mathematical models of coronary artery bypass grafting show the internal mammary artery graft offers better hemodynamics than saphenous vein grafts. Sequential bypasses improve proximal flow but may reduce distal performance, impacting long-term graft patency.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is crucial for myocardial reperfusion in severe coronary stenoses.
  • Graft choice (internal mammary artery vs. saphenous vein) and configuration (single vs. sequential) significantly impact post-surgical coronary hemodynamics.
  • Hemodynamic factors influence graft patency and may promote long-term atherogenic processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an improved mathematical model of the cardiovascular system, specifically detailing the coronary tree.
  • To simulate and analyze hemodynamic performance of different coronary artery bypass grafting configurations.
  • To assess the impact of graft type and configuration on flow dynamics and wall shear stress.

Main Methods:

  • A closed-loop mathematical model of the cardiovascular system was enhanced with a detailed coronary tree description.
  • Models for internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts were developed.
  • Simulations included single and sequential grafts of both internal mammary artery and saphenous vein, alongside coronary stenoses.

Main Results:

  • The single internal mammary artery graft demonstrated superior hemodynamics (flow rate, wall shear stress) compared to the single saphenous vein graft.
  • Sequential bypasses exhibited improved hemodynamic performance in proximal coronary segments but reduced performance distally.
  • Simulations predicted modifications in flow waveforms, velocities, shear stress, and flow distribution based on bypass configuration.

Conclusions:

  • The developed mathematical model serves as a valuable tool for investigating coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.
  • Internal mammary artery grafts appear hemodynamically advantageous over saphenous vein grafts for single bypass configurations.
  • Bypass configuration significantly alters coronary hemodynamics, influencing potential long-term graft health and requiring careful surgical planning.