Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Phimosis: is circumcision necessary?

P A Dewan¹, H C Tieu, B S Chieng

¹Urology Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

|August 1, 1996

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ureterocystoplasty with renal preservation in young infants.

Pediatric surgery international·2013

Same author

Management of post-operative bladder spasm.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2005

Same author

Bowel imbrication in the management of anorectal anomalies.

Pediatric surgery international·2004

Same author

Does the endoscopic technique of ureterocele incision matter?

The Journal of urology·2004

Same author

Ulaanbaatar procedure for tubularization of the glans in severe hypospadias.

The Journal of urology·2004

Same author

Guide wire-assisted urethral dilatation for urethral strictures in pediatric urology.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2003

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Topical steroid application is a viable treatment for phimosis, potentially reducing the need for circumcision. Further research is needed to confirm non-surgical options and establish clear diagnostic criteria for phimosis.

Area of Science:

Pediatric Urology
Dermatology

Background:

Phimosis management traditionally involves circumcision.
Emerging evidence suggests non-surgical options are effective.
Over-diagnosis of phimosis is a potential concern.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate topical steroid application as a primary treatment for phimosis.
To advocate for a standardized diagnostic approach to phimosis.
To question the routine surgical intervention for all cases of non-retractile foreskin.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on phimosis management.
Analysis of non-controlled data for medical treatments.
Proposal for a prospective, randomized controlled study.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Topical steroid application shows promise as a leading non-surgical management option.
Current diagnostic criteria for phimosis may lead to over-diagnosis.
Surgical intervention may not be necessary for all infants with foreskin adhesions or true phimosis.

Conclusions:

Non-circumcision management options, particularly topical steroids, are effective for phimosis.
Establishing precise diagnostic criteria is crucial for accurate phimosis diagnosis.
Further randomized controlled trials are essential to compare non-surgical interventions and guide clinical practice.