[An approach to the emergency surgery for arch and/or ascending aortic aneurysm]

The outcome of emergency surgery for the aortic arch aneurysm and/or dissecting aneurysm is worse than that of elective surgery. To decide the future strategy of the emergency surgery for these disease, 11 patients with emergency surgery (= group E: 8 for aortic dissection and 3 for rupture of the aortic arch aneurysm, age; 61 +/- 13 SD) were compared with 12 patients who had elective surgery (= group S: 5 for aortic dissection and 7 for aortic arch aneurysm, age; 69 +/- 3 SD). Ascending aorta replacement was performed in 7 cases in group E v.s. 1 in group S, aortic arch replacement in 2 v.s. 5, ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement in 1 v.s. 4 and patch replacement of the aortic wall in 1 v.s. 2, respectively. Selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) upon the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used in 45% (5/11) in group E. v.s. in 92% (11/12) in group S, p < 0.05. CPB time, aortic clamp time and SCP time were not significantly different between E group and S group. Postoperative cardiac failure, respiratory failure, renal failure, brain injury and infection occurred at insignificant rates between both groups. Thirty-day and 3-year survivorships were 73% in group E, while in group S they were 92% and 75%, respectively. In group E there were 2 cases which had aortic wall injury due to the aortic clamp used during the surgery. We recommend the use of selective cerebral perfusion and open distal anastomosis in emergency surgery for aortic arch aneurysm and/or Stanford type A aortic dissection.