Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
A comparison of two techniques for weighing young children
Insights
Weighing children indirectly using an adult scale is generally acceptable for assessing weight. This method is reliable for routine checks, though not for highly precise measurements.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Clinical Measurement
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate weight measurement is crucial for pediatric care and monitoring growth.
- Traditional infant scales offer direct weight, while indirect methods may be necessary in certain clinical scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of indirect pediatric weight measurements (child held by a nurse on an adult scale) against direct measurements (infant scale).
Main Methods:
- Ninety children under 31 pounds were weighed using a standardized protocol.
- Statistical analysis included matched t-tests and product-moment correlation.
- Weight differences were plotted against averages to assess scatter.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between direct and indirect weighing methods.
- A high correlation coefficient (0.995) indicated strong agreement between the two methods.
- Minor random discrepancies were observed, with most falling within two standard deviations.
Conclusions:
- Indirect weight measurement is a generally acceptable method for assessing pediatric weight.
- This method is suitable for routine assessments but may not be appropriate when high precision or frequent serial weights are required.
Purpose:
To compare the direct weight of children when weighed on an infant scale to their indirect weight when weighed on an adult scale while being held by a nurse.
Method:
Ninety children who weighed less than 31 pounds were weighed using a set protocol. Analysis used matched t-test and product-moment correlation. The averages of the weights were then plotted against the weight differences to determine the degree of scatter.
Findings:
There were no significant differences between the means of the two methods of weighing. The correlation coefficient was 0.995 between the two approaches. Four sets of weights fell outside of two standard deviations of difference. The discrepancies appear to be random.
Conclusions:
Indirect weight generally is an acceptable method to assess a child's weight unless highly precise or frequent serial weights are needed.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
01:05Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...