Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
Published on: December 19, 2016
Variability in physicians' reported ordering and perceived reassurance value of diagnostic tests in children with
C Macarthur1, J G Wright, R Srivastava
1Division of General Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Objectives:
To determine the variability in the reported ordering of tests and treatment and to determine physicians' perceptions of the reassurance value to families of diagnostic tests in children with "growing pains."
Design:
Cross-sectional survey using a mailed questionnaire.
Settings:
Primary care and referral practices in Toronto, Ontario.
Participants:
University-affiliated primary care pediatricians and family physicians were surveyed, as well as all pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists in Ontario. Pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists were combined into a single group.
Main Outcome Measures:
Frequency of office visits because of growing pains, frequency of diagnostic testing, management strategies for these children, and physicians' perceptions of the reassurance value of diagnostic tests.
Results:
Of 205 eligible physicians, 181 (88.3%) responded. The median reported frequency of office visits because of growing pains was 1%. Compared with the other physician groups, family physicians were significantly more likely to order a determination of the hemoglobin level (P = .003), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = .01), white blood cell count (P = .01), and differential blood cell count (P = .003), but not imaging tests. Family physicians were also more likely to order diagnostic tests when they were under parental pressure to do so (P = .001) or for the child with repeated visits (P = .02). In total, 86% of pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists, 95% of pediatricians, and 100% of family physicians perceived normal test results to be reassuring to parents. Treatment strategies were similar across the 3 physician groups.
Conclusions:
The frequency of diagnostic testing varied among physician groups. Virtually all physicians perceived normal test results to be reassuring to families.
More Related Videos
07:11Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation