Comparison of ureteropelvic transitional cell carcinoma with bladder transitional cell carcinoma using an image...

To elucidate whether a significant difference in malignant potential between ureteropelvic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and bladder TCC is present, the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR), nuclear DNA content and mean nuclear area (MNA) were evaluated in 32 ureteropelvic TCCs and 60 bladder TCCs, and were also compared with histological grade and stage. The parameters used were the mean AgNOR count (C-AgNOR), the percentage of cells exhibiting more than 3 AgNOR dots within nuclei (P-AgNOR), 2c deviation index (2cDI), 5c exceeding rate (5cER) and MNA. No significant difference in these 5 parameters was found between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs. In addition, within each histological grade of tumor, no significant difference in each parameter between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs was noted. Similarly, within pTa or pT1 TCCs, there was no significant difference in the parameters between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs. On the other hand, invasive TCCs (pT2 and higher), the C-AgNOR and P-AgNOR were significantly higher in ureteropelvic than in bladder TCC (p < 0.05), while no significant difference in 2cDI, 5cFR and MNA was noted. These findings suggest that: (i) as a whole, the difference in malignant potential between ureteropelvic and bladder TCCs appears to be less significant, and (ii) factors other than the malignant potential of a tumor might contribute to the unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with ureteropelvic TCC.