Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attention and visual dominance: a chronometric analysis

R M Klein

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |August 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Autopneumonectomie. A Forgotten Disease].

    Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)·2020
    Same author

    On the selection of endogenous and exogenous signals.

    Royal Society open science·2019
    Same author

    The independence of endogenous and exogenous temporal attention.

    Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018
    Same author

    The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Dyslexia and a temporal processing deficit: A reply to the commentaries.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    The magnitude of the fixation offset effect with endogenously and exogenously controlled saccades.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same journal

    Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    See all related articles

    Visual dominance occurs when people prioritize visual information, especially when it seems sufficient. This bias may help compensate for slower visual alerting, impacting attention switching between vision and kinesthesis.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Human-Computer Interaction

    Background:

    • Visual dominance is a well-documented phenomenon in multisensory integration.
    • Understanding the attentional mechanisms underlying visual dominance is crucial for designing effective human-machine interfaces and understanding sensory processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the role of attention and stimulus expectation in visual dominance.
    • To quantify the time costs associated with switching attention between visual and kinesthetic modalities.
    • To determine if visual dominance is influenced by prior knowledge of stimulus modality.

    Main Methods:

    • Three chronometric experiments were conducted comparing responses to visual and kinesthetic stimuli.
    • Experiment 1 measured attention switching times between vision and kinesthesis.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated stimulus expectation and focused attention to examine their effects on visual dominance.

    • Main Results:

    • Switching attention away from vision was as time-consuming as switching away from kinesthesis, but switching to kinesthesis was faster.
    • Visual dominance was observed when participants anticipated the stimulus modality, leading to slower responses to combined stimuli.
    • When attention was directed to a single modality, conflicting visual and kinesthetic information presented equal challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual dominance appears to stem from a bias to attend to vision when it is perceived as adequate for task completion.
    • This attentional bias may have evolved to counteract a potential deficit in visual alerting.
    • The findings highlight the dynamic interplay between attention, expectation, and sensory modality preference in perception.