Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Using a coronary risk score for screening and intervention in general practice. British Family Heart Study
S G Thompson1, S D Pyke, D A Wood
1Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Insights
The British Regional Heart Study (BRHS) coronary risk score is outdated for current screening. Modified scores are more appropriate for general practice risk factor assessment in men and women.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular epidemiology
- Preventive cardiology
- General practice research
Background:
- The British Regional Heart Study (BRHS) developed a coronary risk score in the late 1970s/early 1980s.
- Current applicability of this score for contemporary coronary risk factor screening in general practice is uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the appropriateness of the BRHS risk score for current coronary risk factor screening and intervention.
- To develop and validate modified risk scores suitable for modern general practice.
Main Methods:
- Applied the BRHS risk score to participants in the British Family Heart Study (FHS) from 1991-1992.
- Developed and validated age- and sex-adjusted modifications to the BRHS score using FHS data from 1992-1994.
Main Results:
- BRHS scores were substantially lower in FHS participants compared to the original BRHS cohort, particularly due to lower cholesterol and smoking rates.
- The original BRHS score showed undesirable age-dependence and underestimated risk in women.
- Validated modifications effectively addressed these limitations, providing a more accurate risk assessment.
Conclusions:
- The BRHS risk score may lead to complacency due to outdated calibration and methodology.
- Modified risk scores offer a more appropriate and adaptable tool for coronary risk factor screening and intervention in general practice.
- Proposed modifications are suitable for both male and female populations.
Aim:
To investigate whether a risk score proposed by the British Regional Heart Study (BRHS), derived from data collected in 1978-1980, provides an appropriate basis for current coronary risk factor screening and intervention in general practice.
Methods:
The BRHS risk score was applied to 1993 men aged 40-59 years and 1353 women aged 35-59 years, from 13 general practices in England, Wales and Scotland, who had health checks during 1991-1992 in the British Family Heart Study (FHS). Modifications to the BRHS risk score were made in order to identify subjects with a current high risk compared with others of the same age and sex. These were validated on 3272 men and 2229 women recruited from different general practices during 1992-1994 in the FHS.
Results:
Only 9% of men in the FHS fell into the published top (highest risk) quintile of the BRHS score, versus an expected 20%, and 44% fell into the bottom quintile. Scores were, on average, substantially lower in the FHS men than in the BRHS men, principally because of lower measured cholesterol levels (using a Reflotron) and a lower prevalence of cigarette-smoking. The BRHS scores also tended to increase with age, disproportionately identifying older subjects, and were substantially lower in women than in men. Simple age-related modifications to the risk score were therefore devised to overcome these problems. These modifications performed well in the validation.
Conclusions:
The substantial difference in risk scores between the BRHS and FHS men may reflect both a real reduction in risk and changes in calibration and methodology. Current use of the BRHS risk score may therefore mislead doctors and patients in the direction of complacency. In addition, the published BRHS risk score has an age-dependence that is undesirable in terms of guiding the intensity of lifestyle intervention which should be offered to an individual patient. The simple modifications proposed provide a more appropriate basis for coronary risk factor screening and intervention in general practice, and one that can be used both for men and for women.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management

