Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Would Aristotle have played Russian roulette?

J Harris1

  • 1Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

This study examines the ethical use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in healthcare allocation. It argues against discriminating against individuals with genetic conditions, emphasizing fairness in health resource distribution.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medication use in hospitalized nonagenarians.

Internal medicine journal·2002
Same author

Ignorance, information and autonomy.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2002
Same author

Crete: does farming explain urban and rural differences in atopy?

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2001
Same author

One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.

Journal of medical ethics·2001
Same author

RTOG 96-10: reirradiation with concurrent hydroxyurea and 5-fluorouracil in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2001
Same author

Electrogastrographic norms in children: toward the development of standard methods, reproducible results, and reliable normative data.

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition·2001

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The ethical debate surrounding Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in healthcare allocation continues.
  • Previous discussions in the Journal of Medical Ethics highlighted disagreements on QALYs' ethical standing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze healthcare provision choices made by rational egoists under a Rawlsian veil of ignorance.
  • To further explore the definition of

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of ethical theories, including rational egoism and Rawlsian justice.
  • Critical examination of existing arguments on QALYs and healthcare allocation.
  • Distinguishing between chance and probability in ethical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Rational egoists behind a veil of ignorance may approach healthcare allocation differently than current QALY-based systems.
  • Discrimination against individuals with genetic conditions in healthcare is ethically unjustifiable.
  • Misinterpretation of chance versus probability by some critics undermines their arguments against the author's position.

Conclusions:

  • The ethical framework for healthcare allocation requires re-evaluation beyond simple QALY metrics.
  • Fairness necessitates avoiding discrimination based on genetic predispositions.
  • A clearer understanding of probability is crucial for robust ethical arguments in health economics.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachAristotleHealth Care and Public HealthPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos