Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Method-related variations in estimates of gravity correction values using electromechanical dynamometry: a knee

J L Keating1, T A Matyas

  • 1Department of Behavioural Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Gravity correction methods for dynamometry strength testing yield different results. Mathematical estimates and direct measurements of passive forces can vary significantly, impacting strength score accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Encouraging healthy spine habits to prevent low back pain in children: an observational study of adherence to exercise.

Physiotherapy·2015
Same author

The use of a punchcard information system: 1. The significance of early treatment in spinogenic pain.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

The inter-therapist reliability of the slump test.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

The extension-adduction test in chronic tennis elbow: Soft tissue components and joint biomechanics.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

Comparison of forehead Max-Fast pulse oximetry sensor with finger sensor at high positive end-expiratory pressure in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2009

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Science
  • Kinesiology

Background:

  • Dynamometry is a standard method for assessing muscular strength.
  • Accurate gravity correction is crucial for reliable dynamometry results.
  • Existing mathematical methods for gravity correction may introduce inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare mathematical estimates of gravity correction values with directly measured passive forces during knee flexion.
  • To identify conditions under which mathematical and direct methods yield equivalent results.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Kin-Com dynamometer to collect passive force measurements from 90 degrees of knee flexion to full extension in nine asymptomatic subjects.
  • Compared these direct measurements with correction values mathematically extrapolated from a single force reading within the test range.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Direct passive measurements and mathematical estimates of correction values showed discrepancies up to 50 N between 0 and 70 degrees of knee flexion.
  • Equivalence was observed when the limb was positioned near 50 degrees of flexion and the lower limb mass was accounted for 15 degrees below the lever arm's angular location.

Conclusions:

  • The equivalence of gravity correction values obtained through mathematical extrapolation versus direct measurement cannot be assumed.
  • Specific positioning and mass distribution considerations are necessary for mathematical estimates to align with direct measurements in knee flexion dynamometry.