Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The messenger case

H Harrison

    Journal of Perinatology : Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association
    |July 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Parents increasingly seek decision-making rights for high-risk newborns. Revising guidelines to allow greater parental latitude in treatment decisions can prevent tragic situations and rebuild public trust in neonatology.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Erratum: Measurement of the Sixth-Order Cumulant of Net-Proton Multiplicity Distributions in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=27, 54.4, and 200 GeV at RHIC [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 262301 (2021)].

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in improving clinical processes and patient outcomes in stroke care.

    British journal of neuroscience nursing·2024
    Same author

    Observation of Directed Flow of Hypernuclei _{Λ}^{3}H and _{Λ}^{4}H in sqrt[s_{NN}]=3  GeV Au+Au Collisions at RHIC.

    Physical review letters·2023
    Same author

    Exploring the benefits of nature-based interventions in socio-economically deprived communities: a narrative review of the evidence to date.

    Perspectives in public health·2023
    Same author

    Measurement of Sequential ϒ Suppression in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV with the STAR Experiment.

    Physical review letters·2023
    Same author

    Beam Energy Dependence of Fifth- and Sixth-Order Net-Proton Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC.

    Physical review letters·2023
    Same journal

    Developing a prioritized research agenda for necrotizing enterocolitis.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the real-world effects of prophylactic hydrocortisone in the Canadian Neonatal Network: A cohort study.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    Same journal

    A comparative study of two scoring systems for the assessment of neonatal abstinence syndrome.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    Same journal

    The fetoneonatology fellowship: a unified subspecialty for the fetal-neonatal continuum.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    Same journal

    Short-term outcomes associated with surfactant use in respiratory distress in late preterm to early term infants.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    Same journal

    Resuscitation of neonatal critical care: a call for identity and course correction.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neonatal care
    • Medical ethics
    • Parental rights in healthcare

    Background:

    • Growing parental demand for involvement in treatment decisions for high-risk newborns.
    • Criticism of neonatologists for not honoring parental wishes, leading to public distrust.
    • A recent legal case highlighted the conflict between medical interventions and family desires.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the need for parental involvement in neonatal treatment decisions.
    • To address the public's declining confidence in neonatology.
    • To advocate for revised guidelines on parental decision-making in neonatal care.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of current trends in parental requests for treatment decisions.
    • Review of media criticism and public perception of neonatology.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of a specific legal case involving end-of-life decisions for a premature infant.

    • Main Results:

    • Parental requests for autonomy in neonatal care decisions are increasing.
    • Conflicts arise when medical professionals and families disagree on treatment.
    • Legal and public relations challenges emerge from these disagreements.

    Conclusions:

    • Current practices may not adequately address parental wishes in neonatal care.
    • Revised guidelines are needed to empower parents in treatment decisions.
    • Greater parental latitude can prevent tragic outcomes and restore public trust in neonatology.