Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
[Differentiated treatment and prevention of arrhythmias in myocardial infarct]
Insights
Preventive antiarrhythmic treatment reduces arrhythmias in myocardial infarction patients. Combining specific drugs with supportive therapies restored normal sinus rhythm in 85% of cases, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Myocardial infarction frequently leads to arrhythmias.
- Arrhythmias pose a significant risk during acute and subacute phases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of preventive antiarrhythmic therapy in myocardial infarction patients.
- To identify effective antiarrhythmic drugs and supportive treatments for various arrhythmia types.
Main Methods:
- Electrocardiographic monitoring of 900 patients during myocardial infarction.
- Assessment of individual and combined antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.
- Evaluation of supportive therapies including electrolytes and vitamins.
Main Results:
- Arrhythmias developed in 85% of patients without preventive therapy, versus 75.5% with it.
- Supraventricular arrhythmias responded best to Chinidin, Inderal, and Hiluritmal.
- Ventricular arrhythmias were effectively treated with Lidocaine, Chinidin, Novocainamide, Inderal, and Hiluritmal.
- Combined drug therapy with supportive agents restored normal sinus rhythm in 85% of cases.
- Electroimpulse therapy and cardiostimulation were used for refractory ventricular fibrillation and atrioventricular blocks, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Preventive antiarrhythmic treatment is crucial in managing myocardial infarction complications.
- A combination of specific antiarrhythmic drugs and supportive therapies significantly improves rhythm restoration.
- Tailored therapeutic strategies are necessary for different types of arrhythmias post-myocardial infarction.
Abstract:
Monitoring and electrocardiographic observations were conducted in 900 patients during the acute and subacute periods of myocardial infarction. It was found that without preventive therapy arrhythmias develop in 85% of the patients, and with preventive antiarrhythmic treatment--in 75.5%. A combination of two and more types of arrhythmias was encountered in 42% of the cases. In the presence of routine therapy for myocardial infarction individual antiarrhythmic drugs displayed different efficacy. In supraventricular forms of arrhythmias the most effective drugs are Chinidin and Chinidin-Durules, Inderal and Hiluritmal, in ventricular forms--Lidokaine, Chinidin, Novocainamide, Inderal, Hiluritmal. A combined employment of these drugs against the background of potassium and magnesium salts administration, Inosie-F, water-soluble camphor and Cocarboxylase promoted the restoration of a normal sinus rhythm in 85% of the cases. When the drug therapy produced no antiarrhythmic effect and ventricular fibrillation developed, electroimpulse therapy was employed. In persistent atrioventricular blocks only cardiostimulation was effective.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
07:40Protection of H9c2 Myocardial Cells from Oxidative Stress by Crocetin via PINK1/Parkin Pathway-Mediated Mitophagy
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care