Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Dealing with conflicting reviewers' comments

Nurse Author & Editor

|January 1, 1996

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Journal peer review can be confusing when reviewer comments conflict. This article offers strategies for reviewers, editors, and authors to manage conflicting feedback and improve manuscript review processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Chromoplectic TPM3-ALK rearrangement in a patient with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor who responded to ceritinib after progression on crizotinib.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2016

Same author

Activation of TAK1 by MYD88 L265P drives malignant B-cell Growth in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Blood cancer journal·2014

Same author

Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension.

NeuroImage·2002

Same author

End-of-life decision making: what we don't know, we make up; what we do know, we ignore.

Indiana law review·2002

Same author

Refining outlining skills. Part II: The computer method.

AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses·2002

Same author

Seeing two sides at once: effects of viewpoint and object structure on recognizing three-dimensional objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2002

Area of Science:

Nursing Research
Scholarly Publishing
Peer Review Process

Background:

Most nursing journals utilize multiple peer reviewers to inform editorial decisions.
Conflicting reviewer comments can create confusion and hinder the manuscript acceptance process.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide strategies for reviewers to prevent conflicting comments.
To outline methods for editors and authors to manage disagreements among reviewers.

Main Methods:

The article synthesizes best practices for manuscript review.
It focuses on communication and conflict resolution techniques.

Main Results:

Implementing preventative strategies can minimize comment discrepancies.

Related Experiment Videos

Structured approaches effectively address reviewer conflicts when they arise.

Conclusions:

Proactive strategies enhance the peer review process in nursing journals.
Effective conflict management by editors and authors leads to more efficient manuscript evaluation.