Related Experiment Videos
Projection on projective techniques = pathology: the problem that is not being addressed
1Connecticut College, New London 06320-4196, USA.
Journal of Personality Assessment
|April 1, 1996
Summary
This study replicated Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) findings. While projection correlated with pathology, the "levels effect" was not found for pathology, suggesting context influences results.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality testing
- Psychopathology
Background:
- The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) is a projective test used to assess personality.
- Previous research suggested a "levels effect" where card ambiguity influences responses.
- The correlation between projection and pathology in TAT responses has been previously reported.
Purpose of the Study:
- To replicate the "levels effect" in Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) responses.
- To re-examine the correlation between "projection" and "pathology" in TAT.
- To investigate the influence of card ambiguity on TAT scoring.
Main Methods:
- A replication study using selected Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards.
- Cards were varied for ambiguity and scored for pathology and projection.
- Participants included both normal and psychiatric groups.
Main Results:
- The "levels effect" was not observed for pathology in either group.
- The "levels effect" was found for projection in the normal group.
- A significant positive correlation between projection and pathology was confirmed.
Conclusions:
- The "levels effect" may not be a reliable finding for pathology in TAT.
- The correlation between projection and pathology in TAT is robust.
- Careful consideration of card stimulus properties and testing context is crucial to avoid misattributing pathology to normal individuals.